Theistic Democracy Studies Hadith Analysis Deliberations in Contemporary Islamic Political Ethics

Authors

  • Mahasin Haikal Amanullah Magister Departemen Sosiologi, FISIP Universitas Indonesia Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Adip Fanani Magister Pendidikan Agama Islam, Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61166/bunyan.v2i1.17

Keywords:

Theodemocracy, hadith deliberation, Islamic politics

Abstract

Islam is a religion that exists as a religion today, where many universal questions are discussed, one of the main topics of today's big questions is democracy in politics. Although Islam talks about democracy, ironically, Islam itself does not specifically mention the ideal form of a political system. In this context, the discussion about the ideal political formula becomes clearly important among Muslims in modern times, especially against the backdrop of Western civilization which can be said to have destroyed Muslims with its culture. In the midst of this chaotic situation, contemporary Muslim intellectuals present as Muslim thinkers who seek to present the "ideal" concept of modern Islamic politics. In this study, the author tries to emphasize that the substantive principles of Islam must be applied in the country's political system, in this case theistic democracy exists as a legacy from the problematic modern state. Democracy, or deliberation in Islamic nomenclature, is one of the ethical values ​​of constitutional politics in current political life.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AM. Fatwa, (2001). "Demokrasi Teistis", ed. Sarifudin H.A, Jakarta: Gramedia.

At-Tirmidzi, Sunan at-Tirmidzi, Jilid, III, Bairut: Dar el-Kutub al-Ilmiah.

Agustian Tomi, (2020). Demokrasi islam dalam pandangan Muhammad natsir dan Muhammad abid al jabiri: (semantic scholar).

Ayi Sofyan, (2012). Etika Politik Islam (Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia).

Azra, Azyumardi, (1995). Siyasah, syari’ah, dan historiografi, Dalam Muhammad wahyudi Nafis (ed), kontekstualisasi Ajaran Islam, Jakarta IPHI dan paramadina.

Azhar, Filsafat Politik Perbandingan antara Islam dan Barat.

Fazlul Rahman, (1965). Islamic Methodology in History, Karachi: Central Institute of Islamic Research.

Ibnu Majah, Sunan ibnu Majah, Juz II, Bairut: Dar el-Kutub al-Ilmiah.

Kamil, Syukron, (2003). “Peta Pemikiran Politik Islam Modern dan Kontemporer”, dalam Jurnal Universitas Paramadina, Vol. 3, No. 1.

Nurcholish Madjid, (1999). Cita-cita Politik Islam Era Reformasi (Jakarta: Paramadina..

Ma’arif, Ahmad Syafi’i, (1985). Islam dan Masalah Kenegaraan: Studi Tentang Percaturan dalam Konstituante, Jakarta: LP3ES.

Muslih, Muhammad, (2001). “Demokrasi”, dalam John L. Esposito (ed.), Ensiklopedi Oxford Dunia Islam Modern, Jilid I, terj. Eva Y.N., dkk., Bandung: Mizan.

Mustaqim, Abdul, (2002). “Mendialogkan Islam dan Demokrasi: Persimpangan Doktrin dan Implementasi”, dalam Profetika, Jurnal Studi Islam, Vol. 4, No. 2.

Quraisy Shihab, (1998). Wawasan Alquran, Jakarta: Mizan.

Shihab, M. Quraish, (2007). Wawasan Al-Qur’an: Tafsir Tematik atas Pelbagai Persoalan Umat, Bandung: Mizan.

Thaha, Idris, (2005). Demokrasi Religius: Pemikiran Politik Nurcholish Madjid dan M. Amien Rais, Jakarta: Teraju.

Thaba, Abdul Aziz, (1996). Islam dan Negara dalam Politik Orde Baru, Jakarta: Gema Insani Press.

Urbaningrum, A, (2004). Islamo-Demokrasi: Pemikiran Nurcholish Madjid, Jakarta: Katalis bekerja sama dengan Republika.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-28

How to Cite

Mahasin Haikal Amanullah, & Muhammad Adip Fanani. (2024). Theistic Democracy Studies Hadith Analysis Deliberations in Contemporary Islamic Political Ethics. Al-Bunyan: Interdisciplinary Journal of Qur’an and Hadith Studies, 2(1), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.61166/bunyan.v2i1.17

Issue

Section

Articles